After Virginia monitor athlete Alaila Everett struck her opponent, Kaelen Tucker, within the head with a relay baton, Everett held a rally and thanked supporters just like the native NAACP, who consider her actions had been unintentional.

Supply: thamerpic / Getty

As beforehand reported, in line with WTKR Information 3, Tucker collapsed after the impression and was later identified with a concussion and a potential cranium fracture. Athletic officers instantly disqualified Norcom’s relay staff, and Everett has since been charged with misdemeanor assault and battery.

Everett has denied any malicious intent, claiming that she misplaced her steadiness throughout the race and by chance struck Tucker whereas making an attempt to keep up management of the baton. WAVY 10 reviews {that a} rally was held in help of Everett’s innocence.

“I’d by no means do something like that. I’d by no means hurt anyone. I’m not a fighter. I’m not confrontational,” Everett mentioned via tears at a group rally in her help in WAVY 10.

Portsmouth NAACP Condemns Racial Backlash

Based on the New York Submit, the case has ignited racial tensions. Portsmouth NAACP President James Boyd spoke on the rally, alleging threats and slurs which were directed at Everett’s household.

“The Everett household has skilled racial slurs, they’ve skilled dying threats, and we predict unequivocally that these issues are unacceptable,” Boyd mentioned.

Portsmouth NAACP President James Boyd additionally mentioned that the NAACP is in opposition to the crime claims. As beforehand reported, Everett has been charged with assault and battery.

“We wish to say unequivocally that Alaila is just not an attacker, she is just not a prison, and any … headline that claims that may be a violation of her due course of rights,” Boyd said on the rally.

WAVY 10 reviews that Boyd additionally revealed that the Lynchburg NAACP met with Commonwealth’s Lawyer Bethany Harrison and confirmed that her workplace didn’t file the fees, including to rising issues over how the case is being dealt with.

Which means that the state prosecutor didn’t file the assault cost in opposition to Everett however was as a substitute pursued by the household of the injured runner, Kaelen Tucker.

Whereas it’s throughout the Tucker household’s rights to push for fees in the event that they consider their daughter was wronged, Everett’s supporters argue that this raises bigger questions on equity and precedent. Sometimes, in prison instances, the state decides whether or not to press fees primarily based on the authorized deserves of the case, not private grievances.

On this occasion, the Commonwealth’s Lawyer didn’t carry the cost ahead, which Everett’s defenders see as an indication that the case might not have met the standard commonplace for prosecution.

Video Evaluation Provides Gasoline to Debate

Based on The New York Submit, a lip reader’s evaluation of the viral video instructed that Everett might have been overheard saying “get off” and “hey oh” simply earlier than putting Tucker.

Hypothesis continues to develop over whether or not the baton strike was intentional. Everett has circuitously responded to the lip-reading claims however continues to insist the incident was an accident.

What Occurs Subsequent?

Whereas VHSL has upheld the choice to disqualify Everett’s staff, there was no public assertion confirming whether or not they’re conducting a broader evaluation of the incident.

Tucker’s household continues to demand accountability, whereas Everett’s supporters, together with the NAACP and members of the Norcom group, insist she is being unfairly focused.

Alternatively, others argue that Everett needs to be held accountable, no matter whether or not her actions had been intentional.

This case has now moved past a easy monitor incident, sparking conversations about sportsmanship, race, and the way the authorized system handles disputes between student-athletes.

BOSSIP will proceed to comply with and replace this story as extra particulars emerge.