Two key phrases assist clarify the Legacy Media in 2025.
Projection and narrative.
The latter refers back to the storylines reporters implement with their work. Something President Donald Trump does or says is framed within the worst gentle attainable, for instance.
It’s why CNN beclowned itself by giving a sympathetic interview to a cartel member.
Nice piece as all the time @NolteNC. To all progressives, in case you watch @CNN, you might be siding with gang members and terrorists.
Nolte: CNN Platforms Sinaloa Gangster After Blacklisting 2020 Election Questionershttps://t.co/l3yiUS1U80
— Dan Boots (good/good-looking/hilarious) (@newboots1977) Could 5, 2025
It additionally explains the Legacy Media’s endless assault on J.Ok. Rowling. The lady who helped a technology of children love studying along with her “Harry Potter” sequence is now the media’s go-to villain.
Why? The progressive creator isn’t on board with your complete trans agenda. That’s her crime. She’s been the recipient of adverse information protection since she first began talking out in 2020.
It’s gotten worse of late as Max’s “Harry Potter” TV sequence reboot comes nearer to actuality. She’s an govt producer on the sequence, and understandably so.
There’s no boy wizard with out her.
It’s why media shops questioned if Rowling would insert an “anti-trans” message into the upcoming “Harry Potter” TV sequence. That was Deadline’s massive fear mere days in the past.
Though she who should not be named is closely concerned within the upcoming Harry Potter sequence, Warner Bros. is distancing itself from her views.
Sure, a journalist in contrast Rowling to her e-book sequence’ monstrous villain.
Truthful. Balanced. Reliable. Oh, and the story can also be inaccurate.
HBO Chairman and CEO Casey Bloys informed The City podcast with Matthew Belloni that the creator is entitled to her “private, political beliefs.”
“If you wish to debate her, you’ll be able to go on Twitter.”
Bloys spoke widespread sense. He didn’t distance the corporate from Rowling. He handled her like an grownup. That’s all.
Right here’s the place the projection is available in.
Liberal journalists know the way progressive scribes inject their private, political beliefs” into many tales of late. Their projection assumed Rowling would do the identical if given the possibility.
Besides she’s not enthusiastic about something above and past telling Harry Potter tales.
RELATED: JUDY BLUME CENSORS SELF AFTER SUPPORTING JK ROWLING
Now, Rowling is making it clear she has no real interest in firing a “Harry Potter” co-star whose views don’t align with hers.
Paapa Essiedu, who will play Professor Severus Snape within the sequence, signed an open letter asking UK’s leisure business to “decide to defending the trans group.” The letter comes after the UK Supreme Courtroom decreed that trans girls aren’t technically women-women.
Leisure staff routinely blacklist those that don’t align with their world view. Simply ask James Woods and Kevin Sorbo, two distinguished examples of this mindset.
So, absolutely, Rowling will use her clout to sack Essiedu, proper?
“I don’t have the ability to sack an actor from the sequence and I wouldn’t train it if I did. I don’t consider in taking away individuals’s jobs or livelihoods as a result of they maintain legally protected beliefs that differ from mine.”
One other Legacy Media narrative crushed. Count on many extra anti-Rowling tales within the weeks and months to return.
